Herman Cain Freaks Out Liberals With A Notion Of Personal Liberty

Herman Cain, candidate for the United States Presidency, has sent liberals atwitter.

By a liberal's definition, Herman Cain is a traitor to blacks.  Herman Cain is heterosexual, conservative, successful, and unafraid of liberals.  In any liberal's book, that makes him a traitor.

What did Herman Cain do, that in the view of these liberals, is bound to destroy the United States?

He let a white male heterosexual endorse him, in his own words.  Oh yes, he also let him smoke in a video.  Why does this enrage liberals?

There are many reasons, but here are a few. 

First, liberals are hypocrites who like to smoke, but don't like other people smoking (especially conservatives). 

Second, liberals subscribe to a basic mentality - "I don't like it, therefore everyone else must be prohibited from enjoying it".  That second reason gives rise to many great liberal notions like banning light bulbs, banning pit bulls, but ensuring outrageous displays of homosexual-simulated intercourse (ie the "Pride Parade") on public streets.

There are more reasons, but these two alone suffice.

See Cain's ad and judge for yourself.  Is Herman Cain a radical because he allows a man to be free to do as he pleases, and assumes parents will rear their own children accordingly?

Bless Herman Cain.  May he become the United States' first black president.

Federal Government Panders To Quebec (Again)

Last week, as Israelis celebrated Gilad Shalit's return to Israel, and liberals and Palestinians celebrated the release of thousands of murderers and a chance to kill more Jews in the near future, The Globe And Mail reported in its headline for October 19, 2011, "Ontario, B.C. to lose on seat redistribution".

In summary, Prime Minister Harper had vowed previously to re-examine parliamentary seat distribution and correct representation to account for population changes in each province.

Not surprisingly, Quebec immediately stepped up to the plate, and complained that [any] redistribution that resulted in Quebec somehow losing any kind of representation (be it raw number of seats of percentage) would be problematic.

Of course, this is not surprising for a province whose only contribution to humanity is corruption, laziness, unemployment, drunkenness, liberalism, entitlement, and hot women.  Did we mention laziness?

Equally unsurprising (yet somehow amounting to "news" by The Globe And Mail's standard), Prime Minister Harper kowtowed to Quebec faster than Bill Clinton finishing off a White House Intern.  After all, when was the last time any Canadian can recall the Federal Government kowtowing to Quebec, for anything?

The net result of course will be that Quebec will still control (yes, control) almost 1/4 of the Federal Government, regardless the fact that it is only one of ten provinces, and definitely not 1/4 of the population of Canada.

Why?

Let's just say that in any family, when you live with a spoiled mentally retarded crack addicted prostitute, you have to make sacrifices now and then.  Prime Minister Harper, a liberal at heart, is proving he's capable of making any sacrifice required for re-election.

It's a good things Canadian elected a party with principles.  Mother McGuinty would be proud.

Military Watches "Native" Groups

In what is likely a bid to raise a future federal election issue for floundering Liberals, liberal mouthpiece The Globe And Mail reported on its front page on October 13, 2011, that the Department Of National Defence admits its intelligence group assembled at least eight reports on "native" organization activities between January 2010 and July 2011.  The Globe And Mail further adds that when told of these documents, "one aboriginal leader" said "the thought of the military keeping tabs on natives was "chilling"".

While one can hope this "leader" went on further to say that such observation was understandable, reasonable, expected, acceptable, and sensible, it's unlikely given The Globe And Mail attributes no other quote to this "leader".

Undoubtedly, liberals are enraged to learn our military watches "native" groups.  One supposes they should be.

After all, it's not like "native" groups have ever done anything like take over provincial lands, bearing guns, only to threaten the local populace.  It's not like they've ever hijacked an entire city, only to destroy it, its citizens, the city's taxable base, and its future.  Just ask Julian Fantino about his superior policing in Caledonia that prevented all that.

As every liberal will tell you, "natives" never get drunk, stoned, or violent.  They are all peaceful, earth loving human beings, who are incredibly tolerant, especially of white Christian males.  They openly welcome people onto their tax-free reserves, never look for Government grants or handouts, and are entrepreneurial and independent.  Our booming "dream catcher" market is a mere testament to that.

The Globe And Mail should rest easy.  This is Canada.  Canadians fully support our Government not watching any internal groups, and certainly not any group that might have the slightest propensity toward violence.  It's not like the bombers of Air India Flight 182 lived in Canada.  It's not like Islamic terrorists live in the United States.  All Canadians are outraged, and the federal Liberals need to market this for their next election.

Besides, like true Canadians, the military has already set up a pre-emptive apology, as The Globe And Mail noted:  "The Department of National Defence denies it obtained the intelligence itself, and says the information, which cites confidential sources with apparent inside knowledge of native groups, came from other government agencies.".  Nothing like being afraid of those from whom you are supposed to protect us.  Great job Canada!

Welcome Protesters To Bay Street

We are told it is inevitable that the masses of students, unions, unemployed, class-warfare mongering liberals will come to Bay Street.  We should welcome them with open arms.  Why?

To start, we know Toronto Police will give them a silver tea set reception.  They will be allowed to burn cars, smash windows, and generally assail law abiding tax payers, all without repercussion.  After an orgy of pillaging and burning, primary instigators will leave the downtown core, leaving lawful peaceful protesters, ashamed of their connection to the more lunatic fringe (that last part is difficult since almost all liberals are in the lunatic fringe).

The next day, police will respond appropriately by beating and gassing law abiding citizens minding their own business (you know, taxpayers and what-not).  Basically, conservatives will get beaten up while liberals walk off free and clear.

This will then be followed by numerous talking heads interviewing the professional instigators (liberals) about their thoughts on the protest.  Liberals will wildly assail police (hard to believe since their unionized brethren will allow them to burn cars and smash windows) as being racist, sexist, and homophobic.  They will then blame conservatives, and especially Mike Harris, along with odd references to George Bush and 9/11 conspiracy theories.  They will of course praise Obama and Biden for their "support".

Thereafter, "conservatives" like Tim Hudak and Prime Minister Harper, when asked to comment, will offer poetic words such as "now is the time to set aside our ideology ...", "I'm deeply ashamed of what I witnessed ...", and "this is what happens when you let people like Rush Limbaugh on the air ...".  Of course, there will never be any proof or evidence offered that the (inevitable) riots were caused by conservatives (who by the way were busy going to work, paying taxes, or spending time with their family and kids).  It's just that conservatives will be blamed for inspiring these events in an atmosphere of "hate", "intolerance", and "corporate greed".

Thankfully, no-one will subject any of these protesters to the warm breeze that is logic.  Welcome kooks - let the looting, pillaging, and burning begin.

Why We Need Unions

Times must be tough if the Toronto Star is willing to turn on its greatest lovers - public school teachers and their union.

On Sunday October 2, the Toronto Star reported on its front page that a 40-year old married Toronto-based teacher, after being suspended for allegedly sending sexually explicit text messages to his female students and "spooning" (ie laying in a bed next to them in close contact, back to front) them on a bed in a motel room during a school trip, is now allowed to teach again.

The teacher is considered rehabilitated, in part because he took a course approved by the teacher's union and Toronto District School Board, on how to act appropriately.

Thank goodness, and this is why we need unions.

Had this poor fellow (yes, he is the victim here) been fool-hardy enough to work in the (lower paying, no job security, performance-based and merit-earned) private sector (and assuming all allegations to be true), he surely would have been fired without recourse.

Alas, he would have been unemployed, and had to face hardship.

But thankfully in Ontario, we don't let crazy things like that happen.

Where would our children be then?  Young impressionable teenage women need more involvement with older married men, and thankfully our nation's unions are there to make sure it happens.

Fathers - unleash your daughters in the skimpiest of school uniforms for now they have guidance in a liberal bastion of underachievement.  This is your clarion call.

It's a good thing no right wing fringe lunatic racist tea party crack pot conservative is in charge.  Can you imagine?  This man might have lost his job, his security, and his feeling of self-worth, all of which he has an unrestricted entitlement to.

Daughters rest easy.  He's back, and he's there for you.  Send him a text - he'll appreciate it.

If the allegations are not true, this teacher had better dump this union, because then they are not doing a very good job of defending his reputation and livelihood.

Ontario.  Yours To Discover.